Given all of the "innovation" undertaken by Zip in ANZ and its significantly larger product suite than Afterpay (in ANZ), why did Zip's ANZ revenue grow at exactly the same rate as Afterpay ANZ's against pcp (43% growth)?
Also given its superior revenue yield, why did Zip make an EBTDA loss in ANZ of $3m compared to Afterpay ANZ's EBTDA of $93m?
Are you concerned that Zip ANZ's $28m increase in revenue only generated a $7.5m improvement in EBTDA (at an incremental EBTDA margin of 26%) whereas Afterpay ANZ's $62m increase in revenue generated a $45m improvement in EBTDA (at an incremental EBITDA margin of 71%)
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- APT
- APT vs Z1P H1 COMPARISONS
APT vs Z1P H1 COMPARISONS, page-16
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add APT (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online