there are posts that watso should make a bigger effort to find and then respond to...
anyway - and for what it is worth - but watso has posted previously on how he was accused of everything by the ex - and watso even posted a copy of her capitulation fax to the family court (but excluded identifying information) .. in the end, the only matter before the family court (matters relating to custody ) .. was for all of us to see a head doctor .. the ex could not capitulate fast enough..
one thing for sure is that watso understands women and lies and story telling ...
the Achilles heel for porter is that he threatened to sue the abc for defamation . yet as far as watso can see - he never has..
porter is the AG . it appears that he was a crown prosecutor (state - or whatever) .. and he should know something about the law ..
IF and only IF(and watso has no idea - and happy to be corrected) porter has not carried out with his threat of defamation action against the abc .. then maybe he knows that he has a very weak argument
..... then it should be accepted that porter has the morals of an alley cat .
porter's denials are meaningless.. it is not as if he was going to admit anything anyway ..
anyway - for what it is worth - but on the balance of probabilities - watso thinks that porter is guilty
