VML General Comments - Chat, page-2201

As for Bauk, either way, the shareholders deserve a better more open and  honest explanation, and especially those new shareholders who may have bought in on the announcement of  his appointment.

At the very least, they should be given the option of getting their money back, because they also now have an "unforeseen" circumstance (like the resignation within 6 days of "their" man).

In fact, I'd say if new investors bought in on the news of Bauk's appointment, then they now have "cause for a legal challenge and compensation". If any of them are pensioners and can get free legal aid, I'd encourage them to investigate this. The courts will then make a judgement dependent on Bauk's explanation for not going ahead, which may be legitimate, but it still should not preclude reimbursement or compensation for some new shareholders.

Why is it that retail mum and dad investors always have to cop the rip-off and financial loss? As we all know, the casino system sucks, and all the gaming tables and machines are completely rigged, but we can't leave because we are addicted, and who's fault is that. So there is another potential compensation claim - fault for addiction, or in other words, the (lack of) duty of care of a government for it's citizens by not regulating appropriately it's ASX casino.

And the traders  had a birthday today. What sort of (supposed) egalitarian system let's the stock rocked to 8.6c and then come back to 7c - the grifters and sharks were right into this today, and it sucks. Will this debacle of a stock market trading platform ever end, because basically, it's " ... run by, and run for, criminals ... ".

Gw