$0.10 Fair Value BUY, page-28

"The one thing that R.A.C. has in it favour and that is Historical Data, which came out in the 80's and 90's."

While that's true, the companies involved chose not to push that drug further.

I know over on the rac thread they call it a "forgotten" drug, lost in mergers or something. But that doesn't happen. One does not forget about an asset, that they have poured tens of millions in to.

One big difference between rac and imu is the HC threads. One cannot post anything negative over there. There are many popular posters ramping it up, and a director too. Then there's fomo.

In their last trial results they had 27 grade 3 or 4 serious adverse effects in just 10 people (maybe only 9 as one died (not rac's drug's fault)). They are not nice things to have, especially when you are battling cancer. Things like sepsis.

Compare that to imu's record of zero grade 3 or 4 serious adverse effects in all trials.