Ann: Mt Stirling Assays Continue to Extend Gold System, page-110

thanks mode it certainly does help my learning. I thought it may have been something to do with visuals at site that allow them to say there is something there hence we can class it as a mineralised zone and estimate width but don’t know the grade until assay results complete.

in regards to section 1960 I assume we know the lode snapped due to hole 91 have no significant intercepts but 92 being visually confirmed and now awaiting assays?

using that assumption would it be reasonable to suggest that on section 1880 hole 4 there was no visual mineralisation observed although assays are still pending? Or is it something specific to this being a diamond drilled v RC?

hopefully not dumb questions.

thanks again.