There are no gods, page-226

That's way off.

Did you even read the context in which Sagan made the remark? I don't think you did. You just kerp repeating your ***, as if you are making some sort of a point.

Sagan was not a creationist. His remark was related to what people believed based on the limited information they had, and why they were wrong to draw the conclusion that life was created rather than evolved. Which is why the quote taken out of context, quote mining, is misleading and deceptive.

That is what I am pointing out. It is what the articles I quoted from, Reddit and rationalwiki are pointing out (and providing context).

If you can't understand this by now, I doubt if you ever will. You simply don't want to understand.

Building *** Arguments is not clever, it's just silly.