to all and sundry(debtors ?), page-35

It is these statements below that have made me become more sceptical about the new changes, your posts and others made on this forum. How can you come out in public and state that the bottom line of TZ would not be enhanced by the Fortune 500 deal? How do you know this, back it up???? I will start believing some of the commentary on this forum and vote for the new board if those following the change actually produced credible commentary with cold hard evidence - not just words slandering AS.

"we have 2 examples here with Larson and the Fortune 500 company where the bottomline for TZ would not have been enhanced"

I put this to you - PROVIDE ME WITH SOME FACTUAL EVIDENCE THAT BACKS UP YOUR STATEMENT MADE JUST LAST MONTH.

Mad, your posts and others clearly indicate that you are for a change. Your posts are however doing more favours for AS then anyone else. I have more shares than most of those in the KPOOL group and the more I read this the more I am inclined to vote for AS, when previously it was the other way.