DBT9,
I find myself repeating myself again and again. It is like I am once again replying to Wotsup.
I have previously pointed out the word "could"
I have already stated that Sagan is not a creationist.
Do you actually read any ones replies. When you linked the "reddit" article, did you actually "read it".
Carl Sagan "candidly acknowledged: “ that "The fossil evidence could be consistent with the idea of a Great Designer "
That is the point.
You and the other apologist form the "reddit" article wish to reinterpret what Sagan actually stated
From the "reddit" article
before there was an extensive knowledge of the fossil record.
This is not what Sagan stated.
Get over DBT9. He said what he said. It's done and dusted and so am I.
"The fossil evidence could be consistent with the idea of a Great Designer "
