No doubt, I to think that certain branches of science have information to give than others, certain paths of these branches offer up more relevant information than others and it is quite possible that key aspects that can/may solidify much of what we know/assume we know now haven’t been considered.
Haven’t been considered because none of the scientists in any of the fields haven’t had that eureka moment.
That is a main reason why I dislike the idea that anything that doesn’t fit the narrative of what is assumed today, should be discounted as a pump by the ff industry to discredit the proven science.
The idea that our scientific knowledge is correct about CC and anything that doesn’t fit with today’s ideas must be wrong surely narrows the research parameters, possibly cutting off the possibility of that eureka moment.
