"Dirty" or "non-dirty" REE-uranium mining by GGG, the EIA facts facts and truth behind EIA?, page-113

"My position has always been the same. GGG presented a risk with no guarantee of a ML". Are you daft? I seek out risk, because it's a fun way to make money. You avoid risk because you can't handle the stress. That's fine, but there are some of us who love the challenge, and are not afraid of losing their money. You have called us greedy, but I submit that it is the ones who love their money so much that they panic when their stock price goes down, those folks, IMO, are the money grubbers, the greedy. Greedy people are not suited or logical enough to be a successful investor/risk taker. They will lose the money they have, and are so enamored with.

I repeat what I have previously stated: The people who voted to continue being poor were sold a disingenuous bill of goods by the left, ergo their votes don't reflect the position they should have taken, and that is to upgrade the lives of all Greenlanders by voting FOR a mine that will do that, with virtually no downside risk.

I am just replying to your post to try to get your head screwed on without cross threading. Maybe you should write a book titled "Everything I Know About Investing". It should be easy for you, because it would be full of blank pages.