I don't believe the engineering reasons for the 250MW decision were ever announced. However, several options were investigated during the feasibility study(ies), which settled on the 250MW/2000MWh being considered the best use for the site. There's a lot of factors to consider in these decisions, turbine size, tunnel size, construction cost, maintenance cost, transmission losses, size of transformers, cooling, etc.. As mere internet observers, even if we were qualified, we don't have the information to justify a push for larger.
General GNX News, page-1106
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,117 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add GNX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
27.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $373.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 27.0¢ | 27.3¢ | 27.0¢ | $263.9K | 977.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | 11173627 | 27.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 27.5¢ | 5037239 | 38 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GNX (ASX) Chart |