Think back to the great con merchants over the years. Their MO is to spruik themselves with lots of plausible sounding claims about past achievements. Most of them are eventually proven to be full of hot air and nothing else, but when that discovery is made they are long gone with everyone's funds.
I am not suggesting Kerlie is one of those, all I am saying is that a persuasive argument is the number one tool of any crook. I'm old enough to confess that I've been caught in the past, and the wisdom stays with me. It's now called experience.
I don't like Kelso and I don't like Simpson. I have grave doubts about Kerlie despite his glib and very plausible sounding letter. His so-called experience with KPMG and others is meaningless without documented back up, and as Pigsrus has said, having tinpot journalists straight out of uni repeat those claims as gospel truth is NOT proof of any sort.
The younger brigade would do well to put a fair bit of research into a bloke named Chris Skase.
I honestly don't know where to go here, so inertia is ruling and I'm hoping that someone somewhere can lead us to the promised land. Somehow I don't think the great prophet is going to be found in the candidates we have before us at the moment.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?