IMO a gigabyte, terabyte or petabyte makes no difference really..The tech will be proven on a megabit run but I expect it to stack almost immediately IMO..
Why? Simply because the way the interfiace reram tech works doesnt hinder scaling or stacking and because WDC (Sandisk) have been stacking reram tech to gigabytes since 2014..
Have a look at th3 latest offering they are talking petabytes and then zetabytes for their new range of drives. What 4ds brings to the table is speed at the gate and the abikity to control things wiyhout the need for filaments ergo endurance is no longer an. Issue...
Personally and from a production pspective I dont see the need for another iteration. Not if it has been manufactured to the standards set as described...
In fact I believe it would be off the bench by now and therefore expect news as its hard to keep something quiet forever. 8tey
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- 4DS
- Ann: Quarterly Activity Report & Appendix 4C
Ann: Quarterly Activity Report & Appendix 4C, page-203
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add 4DS (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
7.7¢ |
Change
0.001(1.32%) |
Mkt cap ! $135.7M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
7.7¢ | 7.8¢ | 7.6¢ | $158.3K | 2.054M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 563810 | 7.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
7.7¢ | 9523 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 563810 | 0.076 |
12 | 1052544 | 0.075 |
8 | 931424 | 0.074 |
2 | 700000 | 0.072 |
1 | 1000000 | 0.071 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.077 | 9523 | 1 |
0.078 | 63900 | 2 |
0.079 | 1736 | 1 |
0.080 | 106480 | 2 |
0.081 | 191229 | 4 |
Last trade - 15.49pm 26/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
4DS (ASX) Chart |