Legal: GML denies 2011 agreement with GoG, participated in Govenrment trips, page-21

jefferies says that use would mean "use in atomic weapons and use in nuclear power stations".
-The Greenland government would likely not have considered that GML would do either of these, though these may have been a part of the concerns.

nro says that use would be "If GGG are using the uranium to sell to a country who may be a threat. The GoG could stop it. Thats fair. Selling could be vaguely considered "use""

So you nro would not allow selling to enemies of Greenland of to countries possibly causin

dull says use is not either selling

Certainly money, say a couple of millions, can buy any or all of such legal opinions by very high level "legal eagles". Even thousands of pages of documents claiming the the word "use" does actually not exist or the words "not use" would actually mean: "Greenland government will accept whatever GML would like to do"

But where would a relevant court which would seriously consider that? If you have the agreements or permits, what would they say about jurisdiction/which jurisdiction is referred?

And there is the alternative to proceed with EIA and find its problems and require proper corrections.