Running discussion on SP, page-43786

mate I didnt say it was never going to happen. Re-read Sammaels post above where he indicated he was told by the Company Secretary that in relation to the planned Tin off take for March and the PLS offtake for April, that instead the company was going to "keep them up their sleeve for future opportunities and partnerships"

I understand we have satisfied the stated funding requirement. However if accurate, how is this anything but a major change in plans? With the product driving a large chunk of our future revenue going unproven for demand, I'd like some clarity on this, is all, and the reasoning behind the shift. And not through an off the cuff statement to a shareholder call.

hey it could end up being a good thing, strategically. However I think it's fair to have some concerns given the importance of PLS to our plans...