Yep, I couldn't argue against your facts. You said the banks weren't doing criminal acts. They later admitted they were. You were catastrophically wrong.
So if anyone points out you have been catastrophically wrong, and that's been proven, and that has cost the people who trust you on this ASX forum big bucks, that's an ad hominem act against you. You're the victim, according to you. No one is allowed to criticise your very, very flawed past performance.
Does that mean if you're catastrophically wrong again with a pandemic, and many people die but you don't, that you're going to pretend to be an ad hominem victim again?
