Rubbing my ball, page-757

Your post as a HC nube perked my interest, Willaboy. I'm quite new also.
I could easily be wrong, but it seemed to me every single sentence you wrote could be argued against.
I thought your information 'smelled' funny.
E.g.
IMU is trending well - quite the understatement!
Appropriate consolidation - again with smelly understatement
I purchased millions of these under 1c - I'm not convinced.
Current trials have low replication - ...ok, I'm not sure what this means
Variable results - not good, not fabulous, not remarkably successful, just 'variable'
Results not what I'm used to - so you're used to much better results?
Real test in future when stats can be applied. - I've seen plenty of stats so far already
Acceptable tolerance - acceptable?? I thought the tolerance stats so far appear outstanding!

Then some blah blah about Dr Hoos...whatever, he's doing a fabulous job for IMU. long may it continue.
And to finish, an 'exit point' comment.
Ok I'm new and sincere apologies to Willaboy if his post is indeed commendable.
I do not have much history in biochemistry, but I do have a major in physiology. My real career was in teaching primary kids, here and in other countries....so my expertise?
I can smell BS ...and it 'smells bad'.
As an aside, I am still working out the reasons for up/down ramping....I find most of it a bit see-through and pointless tbqh
I, too, wish I had bought more, Willaboy.
GLTAH