The criers modelling does not reflect what it happening in the world, but instead of changing the model it is changing the data is the modus operandi, & this reflects very poorly on the argument presented.
Especially when we have the tech to solve the problem if the boat is sinking.
Seems to be ok to have 40 to 50 years to get to net zero (which DOESN"T reduce the co2), yet it is TOO long to wait 5 to 10 years to build a fleet on nuclear reactors that will SAVE the world as we know it.
We need to do MORE with LESS, not rape the planet of precious resources to fix a problem that doesn't exist.
