for those that can take profits, page-33

Well that is fair to be doing that if it is being done without trickery.
However, two days ago, what got me was how when i read through your praise (against JoJacs ideas), i was reminded of how good the company was.
You were thorough in some ways and had a logical reason based positivity that still stands and represents all the good points that an investor would want.
And your current negative reasonings on MAE dont even come close when weighed against your positive views.
Those first positive comments held more direct correlations to MAE and were more short term appreciations and they are hard to beat. Yet you have tried to rewind the value of those comments, but they still exist as valid right now. So it does make the 3 day turn aorund, where you became extremely negative, look curious.

What is it that made you ignore those positives and focus on completely different negatives...I would really like to know, because you didnt say ' I was wrong with my analysis and comments and i feel that the positives have less strength than these negative xyz'. You just seemed to post alternating points of view, in line with your holding or not holding the share.

If there is something you cant say, please say just that and i will leave it. Otherwise, do you see why it was so noticeable when you didnt refute argue against any of your own positive analysis?

Thanks,

L