Porter Defamation, page-6

Asked by Porter’s barrister, Christopher Withers SC, whether Dyer agreed with her friend, she said she had “thought the allegation needed to be tested”.

When Withers pushed her on whether she “believed” her friend’s allegations against Porter, Dyer said: “Yes.”

“On that basis you believed Porter should not ever become prime minister?” Withers asked.

“Yes,” Dyer responded.

“And one of the things you needed [for that to happen] was for these allegations to become public?” Withers asked.

"Yes,” Dyer responded.

So the primary intention of the main instigator was for Porter to be named and shamed. This seems to me to be a damning admission.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/may/25/friend-of-christian-porters-accuser-wanted-allegation-public-to-stunt-political-career-court-hears