tamiflu end of shelf life roche gilead, page-12

prophet4me,
Reward is when Biota, that took my money, rewards me for my investment.

It is not when Biota gives me nothing, and I console myself by swindling the next mug who buys my shares and gets nothing.

In the mean time Biota management invents ways of paying each other out of the Biota money. And since shareholders get NO REWARD, there's too much money for the greedy management who, added a couple of extra members to the management, and invented ways to waste money, and made investment mistakes, and lost lawsuits in spectacular ways, to keep the total in the bank below really embarrassing levels for the management.

Which is getting really hard, because Relenza keeps going, and making more money for Biota and GSK, even when Biota and GSK, and Roche, wish Relenza would fail, so the spotlight would be aimed elsewhere, and GSK can stick to the plan and make billions with vaccines, NOT ANTIVIRALS, and Biota management could stash away reasonable amounts of money for each other, so that if nothing else, I wouldn't be able too keep reminding everyone what a corrupt, evil, "scraping off my heel", Biota management, and GSK are. And hopefully THE TRUTH WILL OUT, like what Peter Cook said to GSK in private, and the details in the lawsuit documents etc.

Is this really so hard to understand(?), because I could find new ways to explain the same stuff ad nausium, with one hand tied behind my back, the corruption is so obviously and the effect of the corruption makes everything that happens at Biota and GSK logical.

It explains that Biota shareprices will never be unchained until Biota is run by a management that manage at least one defiant act in support of shareholders, against GSK, and with Peter Cook, convincingly, being shown the exit.