if they were sub underwriters then they bought the shares cause they had to -you can hope all you want for some cryptic message but it is purely a case of the "tail risk" of underwriter - fyi - i got out a long time ago - i still watch just in case, but i now can fully see that this is sad story and we all were taken along
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MHL
- new substantial holder
new substantial holder, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)