In my experience they are generally light on the detail around these topics. I don't think this is particularly anomalous. A bit of analysis, like I presented earlier, shows no cause for concern, imo.
But yes, it would be better if they made a specific statement about something that many would naturally see as somewhat "concerning" at face value. That's one of the problems/challenges with the industry imo - being able to communicate effectively to "laymen", to whom this stuff is not obvious nor simple. It's hard when you are buried in it daily and just expect "everyone" to "get it"!