Arpeebee, by 'misalignment' I am just referring to how the funds under management being captive. In contrast to the open class, investors can vote with their feet by leaving the fund.
If I were a fund manager and wanted to drive the price higher:
Open class: Need to manage the underlying assets, to drive up NAV. Long term value.
Closed class: Underlying NAV still important, but can also market the fund more and talk it up.
I realised that this is somewhat simplified exaggeration but still feel there is enough truth to it to influence behaviour.
Thanks Cutty for your comment - that the gap should decrease as performance increases. I tend to agree.
And SnowSigma, I think technically (i.e. my emotion removed) you are correct. The discount allows me to buy the same assets for cheaper. And the issue of having to then sell at a discount is countered by being a long term buy. i.e. At some point in the future the gap will close and I can reallocate back to open class. I think if MGOC didn't exist I wouldn't have any problem.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MGF
- Ann: MGF Fund Update - February 2021
Ann: MGF Fund Update - February 2021, page-132
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 390 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MGF (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online