Ann: Trading Halt, page-16

I believe the crux of our "argument" on this forum can be boiled down to the following:
You believe or infer that PO3's FRG tech is crap and that management PO3 management is looking to fleece shareholders, and I don't.
Your weight of evidence is as you present above and your understanding of the tech, and my weight of evidence revolves around the calibre of management and their understanding of the tech.
Consequently:
I believe that AS is far better credentialed and has had MUCH greater access to the FRG tech/units than @ozblue, and you seem to think the opposite.
I also believe AS would consider such factors as "overall safety of the unit, fire safety, electrical safety safety of emmissions from different 'smells' in a closed space (new carpets, cleaning agents, plastics, etc common in occupied areas). Also NO information about residual ozone", and you don't.
You seem to assume that company management isn't aware of what ASX/ASIC require before making decisions, I believe that SL, who just happens to be NEC of a +/-AUD2Bn company and is a co sec of PO3, is aware of these issues.
Do you think JE has no idea what government agencies need to see before making decisions re implementing FRG?
CLS is a HNW worth God knows how much. Do you think he's so stupid as to get involved in ramping a share price to sell his 18-odd million shares that he couldn't sell anyhow unless the FRG is genuine.
If the PO3 share price was $100, could he sell 5k shares if it wasn't a justified price.
CLS needs a take out to have any hope of monetising his shareholding.
For that to occur, FRG must be genuine.
And then you harp on yet again about a CR - a CR that I believe will only transpire either when CLS runs out of money, or at a price he deems appropriate & to a party/parties who he allows to get involved.
"All to just produce another ozone generator in the market.."
That's your claim; obviously not that of AS - and I know who I rely on more.