Share
23,415 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1464
clock Created with Sketch.
08/06/21
19:15
Share
Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag
↑
"However, the Department of Home Affairs said the family had been comprehensively assessed a number of times and had consistently been found not to be genuine refugees."
"As a result, the Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) did not accept he had links to the LTTE and would not be "of concern to the Sri Lankan authorities.""
the accusations of lying and the finding of the DHA wasn't reflected in the judgement. However, as you know, laws are changed under the Lib govts and the applications under new laws may not reflect the laws which applied when they came to Aus.
As such the rejection of the family under laws that were not in accord with international laws are specious at best and plain wrong at worst.
Expand
Read the whole article Scott
the family have not been truthful in visa applications and said evidence suggested they came to Australia in 2012 and 2013 by boat as economic refugees
"They have explained their circumstance to every decision maker and judge and every one of them has rejected their claim for protection. That is that they are not refugees,
Expand
They have been proven time and again not to be refugees, their last attempt at circumventing Australian law was to use their little girl. It's sad that a family would do this to a child after lying in their initial attempts. They clearly also fail the character test