Re "I can't comment on Covid one way or another. Damn sure I don't want to get it. The actual proper scientists and other experts say it is real and have devised a way to deal with it."
I think it is reasonably clear that Fauci and the scientists he has allowed to speak have a lot to explain.
Re "I note rather than discuss the false claims about Gore that I have highlighted here, you choose to attack me personally. What was that you were saying about credibility ?"
You're choosing to defend Gore by hair-splitting on the evidence you've been sent. He's not a scientist. Who said he was a scientist?
You ask for evidence of him saying things? What do you expect other than evidence of Al Gore saying stuff when that is what you've asked for? But no, instead of accepting it in good grace, you double down and start excusing the very evidence you asked for.
People are sick of it. The almost religious zeal with which we are told things are about to collapse in around us, and then when it doesn't happen or, heaven forbid, you ask a question, there's an army of apologists ... just like you.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- The cost of disagreeing with the 'warmies'
The cost of disagreeing with the 'warmies', page-86
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 142 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)