The Uranium assays look interesting - it says %. I'd be surprised if there's 8% uranium, its more likely the geo ticked the wrong units when submitting electronic exploration data in the reporting system. Its ppm or ppb, not %?
But then again, I wouldn't say no to an IOCG deposit at surface instead of 500m under cover.
Ann: Exploration Update, page-198
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 92 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
