Oh how atrocious! We can all see it's not 20,000. Instead of posting that fact 10,000 times, why don't you criticise the reasoning he used to get to that figure?
Why don't you use figures and give quotes of his and then explain why he's wrong? It wouldn't fit the mould of the usual flame and bait tactics, that's why.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?