Ann: Commercial Urea Production Contract Awarded, page-90

Yes mate, you are to blame for your own actions.

If you want to throw out factually incorrect information, that's on you.
Downramp the company all you want, but at least try to use criticisms based on truth (not "your" truth, "the" truth).


Lets unpack a few things :

1. Obfuscation ? Either you don't understand what the word means..... or you were, again, scrolling past information as you looked away from the screen.
I literally posted a link to the article (much better than a screenshot of a partial headline), as well quoted pieces of the article (copy and pasted), which show that this was a targeted action (i.e the 2000 + odd listed companies weren't magically audited) and that the "warning letter" had a consequence of "keeping an eye on the 2020 Yearly Report (It's 2021 now, just FYI).
The company has also made public, how they intend to become carbon neutral by 2030.

2. Yes, my name is Cheyne. If you look at the T20, you'll see my name printed right there.
Anyone with an internet connection (which, if they're on HC, should have) can google the email at the bottom of each of my posts, and would be able to discern that. I can also tell you that many posters here can confirm exactly who I am.
Or maybe, I just created this account many many years ago, knowing that a "Cheyne" was going to be a large holder in a company called LCK, and that I could troll an IPL holder with the profile of "Idle Wanderer". Amazing foresight !

3. Speaking of the T20, the most recently published T20 is fairly recent (though Im sure you knew this, being incredibly diligent and thorough in your research).
https://www.lcke.com.au/Investors/Top-Twenty-Shareholders

I've never really had an issue getting access to the T20 list from companies, including those I don't have a significant holding in. Perhaps the issue is you ? Do you carry on similarly, when communicating with companies ?

4. Well when "the gang" throw out garbage insinuations, accusations and irrelevant information in an attempt to downramp a stock, I'd say the fact that they have a vested interest in a future competitor, deserves attention.
Especially when we've had to digest months of rubbish like "issues with flow rates" and "the Flinders gaining WH status" being the end of the world for LCK.

Legman (or Luke, as he likes to refer to himself as), has absolutely nothing to do with me pointing out issues with Willowbanker's screenshot, and then your bizarre defence of it.
How you've come to this conclusion is beyond me, however it matches your other behaviour.

Is there anything else I can clarify for you ?



Cheyne