If, all you can do is dismiss others 'out of hand', then maybe consider taking a break from posting. You seem intent on pouring your scorn and bile on those who have the temerity to disagree with your views. Even when they post the facts. The churlish commentary does very little to advance the TV2 debate - such that it is!
From a historical perspective, I can tell you that I have a reasonable knowledge of TV2. Substantially more than you may imagine (although you do seem to have quite an imagination). Whether you believe that or not is of absolutely no concern to me. However, the prognostications of some posters here (whether they are aware or not) are well considered in my humble opinion.
Did you think that I post on TV2 just to experience the ripostes from @ralt the raconteur (excuse the alliteration - couldn't help myself)?
Noticeably, you posted this very recently "... have asked the questions of the people who would know, that is why I know your source is making it up or you are."
You only need to reference your sources and we can all then examine the information.
I don't think name calling and petulance is a satisfactory substitute for an impartial examination of the facts. @enviromass posted some facts earlier in this discussion and they were not challenged ... why? I suspect that is because the pro posters have no plausible way to rebut the facts.
And can I ask how long you have been a holder or TV2 poster? I started out when they changed from GAL (an old mining shell) in 2015 (from memory). I don't recall you participating in the discussion in those early days - but that might just be my failing memory.
TV2 Price at posting:
0.8¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
