FMG Hydrogen Trials: Green Production, page-26

mate you are a nine ball...


for a start he explicitly in bold says 'estimated' and that was for solar based alkaline hydrogen production. Two other process are mentioned being solar-based high temperature steam electrolysis.

Also, the article closes saying wind-energy derived electrolysis may be even lower in carbon footprint.

Classic example of a quote taken out of context. The article in general supports H2 production via renewables. Its a fact that the process is energy negative but when you have an unlimited source of energy (the big fiery thing in the sky and the blowy air that spins things with wings) it's probably feasible.

I refer to my above comment... go shill elsewhere, or provide a solution with your whinging. Currently your solution is looking like just shut down every thing that emits carbon immediately