For the good of your being taken seriously I suggest that you don't twist posts for cheap shots.
You say:"It your comment that suggest the company is acting against the law and that is why you bought into EPM yeh."
That's a bit incoherent but I can only take it to mean that I think the company was acting against the law.
That's a nasty twist to what I wrote, which was quite the contrary.
You had written that 'the company management knew about uranium banned for over decades'.
I replied that your comment maligns the management of GGG, because it means that GGG was knowingly acting against the law of the land by proposing to do something that was banned. Do you know of one instance? I don't.
EPM Price at posting:
2.2¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)