for shi1s and giggles i'll entertain your crap Reasons why what you post is irrelevant:
the link YOU posted also had Wind Electrolysis coming in around 0.5T/T
95% of the CO2 generated by hydrogen production via wind farms is caused by the construction of wind farms.
Electricity is still needed to power a Telsa ( but its actually less efficient because H2 will be produced in optimal locations, not where electricity grids are, but we'll just call it even)
Battery powered cars are ~2.5x more energy efficient then Fuel Cell cards,
So if 1T of H2 caused 0.5T of C02, a battery car would would cause 0.2T in electricity consumption alone for the same distance. 0.3T less.
Lithium batteries take somewhere around 100kg/kwh, or 7.5T for a Tesla model 3 battery,
That means a fuel cell car will need to use ~11.5T of H2 before it catches up to the C02 output of a lithium Telsa Model 3.
(11.5T of H2 for electricity VS 7.5 T for Battery production +4.6T for Electricity usage)
How far can you go on 11,500kg of H2???About 2 MILLION KILOMETERS BEFORE A TESLA IS BETTER THAN A HYDROGEN CAR!
Future wind turbines are looking at 6g/kwh (55kwh/kg for H2. 330g of C022 /kg of H2
Once production of green steel & concrete is ready ~20 years, those wind turbines are going to cause very little C02, negating most of the above anyway!!! Basically CO2 Free electricity from Wind & hydropower!!!!!
So basically.... Hydrogen will be better in the long run. Sorry Elon, mining lithium is not the solution to solving the world.
More so, the Target maket for H2 is not cars, they only make up about 9% of the market..... so stress less about your little Tesla/Lithium investments, they're safe for now.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)