Share
3,958 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 97
clock Created with Sketch.
15/07/21
23:40
Share
Originally posted by zipperlip:
↑
”Fair enough, PP”? No it is not, Johilo! Our friend uses his beliefs that MMCC is based on fact to support his views on the EV revolution all the time. To discuss the EV without MMCC/MMCO2/Finite Resources being in the discussion is senseless. As for the EU suggesting more Co2 reductions? Reading Aussie grids to handle percentages of renewables? Green hubs in the NW? All of these things are still in the wish list phases and as such still need to be proven feasible, They don’t make MMCC correct. Twiggy’s attempt at building a hydrogen hub is feasible but it is a long way for proven to be possible on such a scale. It is great that his company is willing to have a crack, we should always encourage those who seek to improve technology but it isn’t necessarily a given that it will be effective. Hopefully it will be a great success? Back at the start of last century hydrogen was a winner in the race to make air travel a thing. For a couple of decades it looked as if there was no stopping it until the downside issues were raised, I seem to recall. The world still has a long way to go with the science as I see it and being sceptical isn’t the same as suggesting that the earth is flat. That taunt is just for the people with the Nlinkers firmly on their heads.
Expand
I’ve read more of the posts of the “friend” and now understand your response and warning. Thanks for the heads up. Confirmed, a waste of precious time ... it is short. No amount of discussion could elicit a concession........ Even before 2025. I hope to be able to see 31/12/2025 giving maximum time “by 2025” and see the results of the wonder grid. I’ll keep some gas cylinders and the trusty Kawasaki genny just in case.