A ban on the controversial herbicides glyphosate and paraquat would cost farmers hundreds of thousands of dollars annually, UWA research has found, as pressure builds for farmers to adopt alternative weed control measures.
Key points:
- The losses would be greatest if the herbicides were banned in Australia but not worldwide
- Calls to ban the weed-killers in Australia have grown in recent years following international bans and a multi-billion dollar lawsuit
- Most farmers don't think anything could replace glyphosate, but some disagree
Glyphosate, sold as Roundup, has been banned in dozens of countries worldwide and by multiple Australian local governments because of its toxicity to humans.
Many Australian farmers use glyphosate alongside paraquat, a more toxic herbicide, to kill weeds prior to sowing their crops.
This prompted research by the University of Western Australia's Alison Walsh and Professor Ross Kingwell, chief economist at the Australian Export Grains Innovation Centre, to model the outcomes for farmers in WA's Wheatbelt region if the herbicides were banned.
These losses would be greatest if the herbicides were banned in Australia but not worldwide, as this would disadvantage Australian farmers without raising international grain prices.
Alison Walsh studied the likely consequences of a herbicide ban on farmers' profits for her UWA Masters thesis.(
Supplied: Perth NRM
)
"The herbicide options completely change without glyphosate and paraquat."
"Costs increase significantly. I think it was $20,000 for an average farm [using alternative herbicides] with slightly less efficacy."
Pressure to ban
In 2019 the pharmaceutical company Bayer, which sells Roundup,estimated"around $400 million of glyphosate-based products were sold in the Australian market each year [making it] the largest selling agricultural chemical product on the Australian market."
In 2020, Bayerpaid out US$10.9 billion in settlementsover a lawsuit alleging glyphosate causes cancer.
As the number of countries banning glyphosate has grown, pressure has mounted to do the same in Australia, or at least reduce farmers' reliance on it, in order to protect health and maintain access to international markets.
'Couldn't possibly farm without it'
Glyphosate is an essential tool on Lindsay and Grant Tuckwell's WA farm.
"We'd have to walk away from cropping without glyphosate," Lindsay Tuckwell said.
Even having suffered daily nosebleeds for 10 years after exposure to a paraquat-based herbicide, Grant Tuckwell doesn't think either chemical should be banned.
Hugh Beckie, director of the Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative and professor of crop weed science at UWA, doesn't see an alternative.
WA grain farmers "rely on herbicides to do the heavy lifting in terms of weed control and glyphosate is the number one go-to herbicide for them", Professor Beckie said.
"[Were it banned] there really isn't any other herbicide that could come close to filling its shoes."
An alternative model
WA farmer Nick Kelly has a way of managing weeds without herbicide — he crowds them out of his fields by planting perennial summer pastures.
"We stopped using synthetic fertilizers in 2013 and stopped using chemicals three years ago," he said.
His transition away from herbicides took a number of years but he claims his farm is profitable and believes other Wheatbelt farmers can do the same.
Nick Kelly's Newdegate farm on February 17 (left) and May 17 (right), 2021. Summer perennials give way to a cash crop of Khorasan wheat, halberd wheat, Beecher barley, Dampier barley, lupins and field peas.(
Supplied: Nick Kelly
)
"In three to five years you can have a turnaround," he said.
"If you have animals it's easier — if a crop isn't going well you can use it as [livestock] feed."
Professor Beckie doesn't think pastures can completely replace herbicides.
"Pastures have always been considered by weed scientists like myself to be a good option [but] in my experience you need to combine a number of tools, including herbicides, to get a sustainable weed management program."
Whether Australian farmers will have to test these alternative tools, and the economic consequences if they do, remains to be seen.
(20min delay)