FGR - Trading and Technical Analysis, page-105

Hi @Bigglesworth

I will try to answer. You said you are not sure what my point was...
Well, just simple.. So glad it isnt only WG style to talk about FGR. AG made a summary, based on the same papers as WG did. AG just said, well it was a non binding MoU for Puregraph and (!) Puregraph related technics / products.
I just wanna ask you, whats your thoughts, maybe feelings if we never had such or any comments by WG.

I am not a lawyer or can comment on obligations about WGs "golden ticket" style (that was my comment about him after this stand in a row after Nicnas). But we had so many discussions about WG....

I would prefer some Interviews about the Aus products and a follow up on what's going on with Green GO, improved VFD material for eleytrolysis of hydrogen or a timelime for the boat.

I really like this part of the Graphene Flagships note on quality and standards..




I dont know if Gerdau and or Nanoxplore think different or have a solution. I expect that the liners, the swimmingpools, the boots and boats have such a kind of standards.

As I have said, I am not interested in the options, I expected and still expect a long difficult road to Cash flow positive. Show me the products and improvements, thats it for me.

And I just pointed to AGs video, because so many good posters here are getting upset again and again.

Have a great weekend, cheers,

L