Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Science proves itself, page-115

First 115 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

58,171 Posts.

664

28/07/21

23:20

Post #: 54851835
Share

Originally posted by Parsifal: ↑

if you haven’t read enough posts to know that they are consistently misogynistic and sexist you’ve missed them. It’s a fiction and more misogynistic than it is sexist. There’s a reason they use attractive women in car ads and it isn’t because women buy them. There’s a reason that luxury items are often targeting men - because men have a habit of buying them for their wives and lovers. Boats. Hmm pretty sure they target men. Farm equipment and tools. Men’s stuff.
reading Qantas magazine or the magazines in their reading racks weren’t exactly targeting women but I guess you had to be a frequent flyer to know that.

does it matter anyway - it’s petty and stupid

other then misogyny however it is also an example of cognitive dissonance. We will continue to notice and reinforce those things that match our interests, beliefs and preferences. We will, if necessary, ignore or explain away that which would otherwise give us a headache.

Expand

we are just people.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

PH2

Hydrogen at a crossroads: Plug Power, Pure Hydrogen and Nel ASA between opportunity and crisis – Your profit strategy

ASX Market Open: Downturn as tariffs regime finally pushes US CPI higher | July 16

AII

Nasdaq-listed Almonty Industries receives substantial cash injection

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

First 115 Last

SPONSORED BY