Ann: Garner 1 well intersects significant pay zon, page-17

re: Ann: Garner 1 well intersects significant... btw skitzo before you start impugning others maybe you should declare what relationship you have to hartleys. You seem to have proclaimed quite loudly how supportive they've been of AMU. Particpate did we?
(And no that doesn't mean I didn't. But personal short term benefit doesn't justify that last 3 years either.)

So supportive Hartleys have been that they couldn't get the SP up so as to raise at a decent price? lol Clearly they are the brokers broker then.

There will have been very few existing shareholders who benefited from this placement but there are some. But there are many more new holders who have benefited disproportianately. Why because they have been "supportive" of a Co that has gone backwards in SP, O&G output, Profit Dividends, communication etc etc for more than 3 years.
Now who's deserving? Long suffering holders or new insto's.

No need to answer the proof is already in the SP.

Fair chance now that once the insto's start selling we'll all get another chance anyway. Will be the first placement in history if none of those 100m shares aren't flipped at whatever price they can get.
Question will be has the Co aided its push to raise the SP or hindered it.
Skitzo you're the only one I've spoken too/heard from who's raving. lol.