Ann: Garner 1 well intersects significant pay zon, page-19

re: Ann: Garner 1 well intersects significant... well at least you're prepared to enter into intelligent debate lol

You may well ask Why have previous successful wells failed to excite the market? As I've said before. The problem here isnt the assets, the house broker (anyone could've issued 100m shares at a 30% discount), the POO ($147bbl anyone), the loyalty of existing shareholders, the lack of sufficient qualified people/profile on the board (Pete L is exactly the sort of Bd members they need) etc etc etc .
Its all been done to death, Even average Co's run by fools with good assets can get their SP up in a bull market.

AMU's had 2 in the last 3 years: an equity bull and an oil bull neither stopped the falling SP. If you're football team played like this someone would be accountable.

Still as you've said before: "You failed to answer the question directly (as usual)". Clearly you have the same issues lol. But then thats the answer isnt it?

Little point in us debating this other than to acknowledge that the market is and has been right on this Co for 3 years. That obviously hasn't changed over the last 2 days.