Does Ambrose think that YouTube is like a newspaper editor who commissions content? And because one of the millions of ordinary people who upload content to YouTube has been found to be a sexual offender, that YouTube are somehow implicated? And - even more bizarrely - does Ambrose think that is the reason Sky News was banned as cover for this scandal?
If Ambrose really considers any of that makes sense and is not a hallucinogenic fantasy from someone with no knowledge of how social media has worked for the last few decades, then I have just one two-part question for him.
How can I contact your dealer and how much for the good stuff, like you got?
