I don't think they can be "bad", just maybe a bit "ho hum". We know there's a bunch of pge's in the ore and this is to find a way to get them out rather than losing them thru to tailings.
The rules are around "materiality". So if the results are a material positive they must be released. If they are boring, then immaterial. The question I suppose is, if the results are not great then are they materially bad?
I've convinced myself the results will be great...in the lab. The overlying issue is we don't have enough ore with the good stuff in it, so the results are moot.
Ann: Soil Assays Confirm New Ni-Cu Target at Mt Alexander, page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 69 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.7¢ |
Change
0.002(8.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $29.39M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.4¢ | 2.7¢ | 2.4¢ | $296.2K | 11.52M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1360311 | 2.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7¢ | 1082090 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SGQ (ASX) Chart |