gibba
furthermore, i have enquired regarding the major shareholder before and i was told that the shareholder held less than 5% of the stock and therefore no change in substantial holder was necessary
if you examine the volumes over that period (and now), there is no logical reason to think otherwise.
i genuinely believe that you will soon be changing your tune about management kicking some goals for you
farm out, page-107
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
