General Discussion Topics, page-16314

Ya but I just proved it with the real ' Geological ' substantiation and references to other similar deposits. So now they ( Piedmont ) just have to disclose that this is also what they have. Not likely ( to disclose that is ) ....so you would have had to do the research BEFORE the market had most likely priced it in.....and therefore bought in on those assumptions. Do you see where I'm going with this..... And in the case of Piedmont , this could go a ways to justifying why their MC is so much larger as I had first pointed out with their by-products some time ago.

In Jourdan's case and most likely with NAL's mineral compositions , they haven't even proved up the tonnage of Lepidolites & micas , Feldspar's ( Alkali Albites and K-spars ).

So until they at least had the tonnage in some of these ' Bulk ' tonnages of essentially rocks then it's just pie in the sky and an outright unsubstantiated ramp. Which is what I stated at the time. But Piedmont is different - and if they go whole hog in developing their flow chemical extraction sheets accordingly , then that is something Sayona may or may not be able to capitalize on should they find the by-products as well at mainly Tansim and possibly at Authier expansion and / or NAL expansion.