dramatic upside potential, page-75

PlusSign,

Are you saying that there was a second powerbox installed back in Feb 2008. If yes, why wasn't it mentioned by anyone.

If you are talking about the same one that I am (at Stora Enso), then your post is not accurate. ERJ themselves confirmed that the SE powerbox had issues. It apparently had glue int he water, causing all sorts of issues. THis was not Opcons fault apparently and should have been easy to rectify. But it certainly does not match the description in your post. Unless of course it is a different power box.

And i note you did not leave any contact details as I did. And don't say that this is to protect their identity or something rediculous like that. If this company is a legitimit company, and the powerbox really worked as well as you say, I would think that they would have absolutely no problem having a quick chat with astute investors. I'm sure they would ahve invested in Opcon themselves, so would be happy to spread the word. Due diligence is not an infringement on privacy for serious company directors.

So without any proof, your post is worthless. It is just you saying it, which unfortunately doesn't mean much.

Like I have always said, i hold shares and want the best for the company. I just want to get to the bottom of what is actually going on. Which is what every investor should do and is entitled to.