SGQ 6.90% 3.1¢ st george mining limited

Ann: Drilling of New Targets at Mt Alexander, page-58

  1. 970 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 636


    This might explain our rising price people are getting excited about the Komatiites.
    they are associated with Fe,Co,Ni,Au,Cu,TI,Bi, and PGE's and can be strongly enriched in
    Ni, Cu, Au, PGEs and other chalcophile elements,whichmay accumulate to
    form ore deposits directly or be dispersed in the komatiites.

    For full paper see https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0512/0512118.pdf


    4.1. Komatiites and ore forming processes

    Another interesting aspect of komatiitic magmas is their importance in ore
    forming processes. They are among the few mafic/ultramafic lavas types that
    are S-undersaturated at the time of magma formation and do not reach S-
    saturation until a late stage in their ascent from the mantle. This S-
    undersaturation is due to the high temperature of these magmas produced by
    large degrees of partial melting of upper mantle source regions that were
    already depleted in S through earlier partial melting events. S-saturation of
    magmas leads to depletion in the chalcophile metals, in contrast komatiitic
    magmas retain the full complement of chalcophile elements (including Fe, Co,
    Ni, Au, Cu Tl, Bi and PGEs) that the magma derived from the mantle source.
    When they become S-saturated they may form sulphides, strongly enriched in
    Ni, Cu, Au, PGEs and other chalcophile elements, which may accumulate to
    form ore deposits directly or be dispersed in the komatiites (Keays, 1995).
    Platinum-group element (PGE) abundances including Os, Ir, Ru, Pt, Pd have
    been reported in komatiites (Table 4). PGEs are present at higher levels in
    komatiites than in basalts making komatiites better probes of mantle PGE
    abundances (Puchtel and Humayun, 2000). In accordance with these authors,
    the spinifex-textured (MgO = 25 - 28%) and cumulate (MgO = 34 - 37%)
    komatiites are moderately enriched in Pt and Pd relative to Os and Ir with
    (Pt/Os)N = 2.5±0.4, and exhibit chondritic (Os/Ir)N = 0.98±0.06 ratios.
    Generally it is observed that, in ultramafic magmas, PGEs are very strongly
    and roughly equally enriched in any sulphide or metallic minerals that are
    present. They can provide unique information on the important role that sulfur
    plays during magmatic processes, a role still ignored by most petrochemists. It
    has been observed in many geological shields (e.g. Yilgarn, Perseverance,
    Pilbara, Zimbabwe, Kambalda, Abitibi terrains) that abundant komatiites host
    magmatic sulphide deposits rich in nickel (Barnes et al., 1995; Moore et al.,
    2000; Lahaye et al., 2001; Barnes, 2004; Hill et al., 2004 and show high
    content of Ni. Almost all of the largest known concentrations of komatiite-
    hosted Ni sulfide deposits (but also Fe-Cu-PGE deposits) formed during the
    Archean. However, some komatiites of Permian-Triassic age (Northwestern
    Vietnam) are also associated with Ni-Cu-(PGE) bearing deposits (Glotov et
    al., 2001). Magmatic Ni-Cu sulphides strongly influence the precious metal
    contents of komatiites because they are greatly enriched in these metals
    relative to crustal rocks (Keays, 1982). Most komatiite-associated magmatic
    Ni-Cu-(PGE) sulfide deposits formed from sulfide undersaturated magmas
    and are interpreted to have formed in dynamic lava channels or magma
    conduits by incorporation of crustal sulfur. They commonly exhibit
    geochemical and isotopic evidence of crustal contamination (e.g., Th-U-LREE
    enrichment, negative Nb-Ta-Ti anomalies) and chalcophile element depletion
    on the scale of individual cooling units (Lesher et al., 2001). Thermal erosion
    and incorporation of sulphur-rich sea-floor sediments have been proposed as a
    mechanism by which the komatiites were brought to sulphide saturation
    (Huppert et al., 1984; Groves et al., 1986; Lesher and Groves, 1986).
    Among the chemical analyses for determining PGE abundance in komatiites,
    osmium has been studied in detail, particularly its isotopic composition. As
    with modern plumes, the sources of Archean and Proterozoic komatiites
    exhibit a large range of initial 187Os/188Os ratios. Most komatiites are
    dominated by sources with chondritic Os isotopic compositions (e.g. Song La,
    Norseman-Wiluna, Pyke Hill, Alexo), though some (e.g. Gorgona) derive
    from heterogeneous sources (see Table 4). Some komatiites are enriched in
    186Os and 187Os (Brandon et al., 2003; Gangopadhyay et al., 2003). The
    coupled enrichments of 186Os/188Os and 187Os/188Os are very similar to those
    displayed by the Hawaiian and Siberian plumes. Such enrichments could
    originate from the addition of ancient hydrothermally altered or metalliferous
    sediments into the source of plumes (Ravizza et al., 2001). But this is
    contradicted by mixing models and another explanation for the Os isotopic
    variations involves Os transfer from the outer core to the lower mantle in the
    late Archean (Puchtel et al., 2001; Brandon et al., 2003).

    Finally, one of the last attractive discoveries about komatiites has been the
    report of diamonds (Capdevila et al., 1999). Abundant diamonds ranging from
    microdiamonds size up to 4 mm were found in a volcaniclastic komatiite from
    the Proterozoic Dachine island arc in French Guiana, South America. This
    recent discovery was quite unexpected as the tectonic setting is distinct from
    that of all other currently exploited diamond deposits. It places significant
    constraints on the origin of komatiite magmas and the manner in which they
    interact with hydrated mantle in subduction zones. Capdevila et al. (1999)
    proposed that a primary, anhydrous komatiite magma formed by deep melting,
    then penetrated hydrated lithosphere beneath the ancient island arc where it
    collected both water and diamonds. As komatiite magma interacted with the
    relatively cool hydrated base of the mantle wedge, it become hydrous, its
    temperature and density decreased dramatically and it was ejected to the
    surface, bringing with it diamonds. The discovery implies also that some
    komatiites must have originated at depths of ~250 km or greater. It has been
    proposed that diamonds can be natural time capsules, preserving information
    about the cycling of sulfur between Earth's crust, atmosphere, and mantle
    some 3 billion years ago (Farquhar et al., 2002). These authors report that
    diamonds from a region in Botswana, Africa contain a distinctive ratio of three
    isotopes of sulfur. The presence of this ratio indicates that the sulfur in these
    diamonds went through a nearly complete geochemical cycle. Thus, diamonds
    are valuable crystals through which geologists and atmospheric chemists can
    peer to gain insights into the Earth's atmosphere as it existed billions of years
    ago.
    Whereas the petrological features of komatiites have been the purpose of a
    wide range of studies, relatively little is known about their volatile abundances
    because of significant alteration of rocks and lack of fresh glasses. Despite
    claims to the contrary, some komatiites display evidence of being volatile-
    bearing like hydromagmatic amphiboles (Stone et al. 1997), and degassing
    structures i.e. segregation structures and vesicles/amygdales (Beresford et al.,
    2000). Studies of melt inclusions in olivines provide information about
    volatile contents of komatiites (McDonough and Ireland, 1993; Woodhead et
    al.,2005). For example, melt inclusions found in nearly fresh Belingwe
    komatiites contain up to 1.1 wt% of water, detectable CO2(up to 200 ppm),
    sulfur (500-750 ppm), chlorine (400-700 ppm) and Cl with Cl/K2O ratios 0.8
    – 1.5 (Woodhead et al., 2005).
    In many komatiite sequences worldwide, there is a strong spatial correlation
    between volatile-rich phases or vesicles/amygdales, and different styles of
    komatiite-hosted Ni-Cu-(PGE) sulphide mineralisation. However, it is unclear
    whether the volatile content of mineralised sequences plays a role in the
    genesis of komatiite-hosted NiS mineralisation, either in the control of sulphur
    solubility or/and in the concentration of sulphide blebs (Fiorentini et al.,
    2005).


    all the best

    FireflyOne
    The writer's opinions are his own and do not constitute financial advice in any ways.Nothing here constitutes an investment recommendation nor should anything written here or published by myself be relied upon for any investment activities.I strongly recommend that you perform your own independent research and/or speak with a qualified investment professional before making any financial decisions.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
3.1¢
Change
0.002(6.90%)
Mkt cap ! $30.64M
Open High Low Value Volume
3.0¢ 3.2¢ 3.0¢ $143.8K 4.665M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 500000 3.0¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
3.1¢ 460102 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 11/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
SGQ (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.