movement at the station, page-4

I'm pro. The additional revenue streams are what ELK needs to help progress the company. 33% of something is better than 100% of nothing re Ash Creek. Similar thinking re Kakadu etc (50% share). There are mature oilfields littering the landscape over there. ELK will have plenty of opportunity to develop additional projects if they can get out of the spec bucket. Im interested as to how the chemical flood potential of the Ash Creek Shannon would fall into this agreement ??