Yeah yeah of course they have. They performed autopsies on every one of the 500+, didn't they, and determined exactly what caused their deaths, didn't they? Just like all of the VAERS (and similar overseas) reports were intensively investigated to try to understand why so many people were susceptible to severe reactions and death.... just like the poor kids who were severely injured in the trials were studied with a fine-tooth comb to understand why and how they reacted as they did... oh, hang on... no, they were mostly (and continue to be) just brushed aside with the ol' favourite line "you cannot prove we caused it ... run along now"...
When the so-called "authorities" are blatantly ignoring scientific evidence, how do they expect anyone to believe their latest "claims"..?
e.g. They still say "there's not enough evidence" for some critical effective existing treatments, yet the data and scientific analyses absolutely disagrees with them:
They think that their sweeping generalisations about "not enough evidence" and similar garbage will be swallowed whole by the ignorant public, and for the most part they are right..... but they forget that many people actually go looking for the scientific evidence base, and discover that their little "official" story and claims are full of gaping holes. ....and their miserable attempt to plug those holes when they are pointed out comprises censorship and additional flaky and generalised claims, and of course ZERO debate with scientific and medical professionals who question their claims. It is laughable, and according to the actual scientific evidence base, it is costing lives, unnecessarily.
And you seemingly support it, and join wth them in parroting slogans to sell the campaign?
Whatever happened to robust information standing on its merits, instead of requiring threats, baseless ridicule, coercion and censorship to "sell" a specific, predetermined and inflexible position at any cost...? When did we wake up in North Korea..?
