If ASX's real intention was to make enquiries to ensure the market was well-informed, yes the suspension made sense. That was the impression they gave.
But their pattern of questioning suggested a different intention. They misled us. That's the problem, and that's why we've ended up in court. And ISX is now trying to prove they had a different intention than what they informed the market from the start.
ISX was concerned there was no end in sight to the questioning. A company's shares can't be locked up forever while questions are being asked. That's not a proper use of the suspension power.
ASIC on the other hand followed a proper approach. ASX was trying to get them to give a suspension direction but they didn't, possibly because they figured it was an abuse of power.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- Ann: Prospectus
Ann: Prospectus, page-80
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)