Ponder this....
This is still absolutely plausible in many instances :
Person A:
Jabbed
Obese
Diabetes etc.
Person B:
Not jabbed
Fit
Healthy
Slim
No underlying conditions
Due to the media fear-porn and encouraged segregation based on supposed "threat", Person A is automatically considered (and promoted) by many as "safer" and "lower risk" and "ok to be around" etc etc, whereas Person B is considered by many as effectively a reckless danger to society, to be avoided, and putting others at risk....
DESPITE the fact that, if exposed to SARS-CoV-2, Person B may indeed have a LOWER chance of developing Covid19, developing symptoms etc, and thereby actually be a LOWER "threat" to others, compared to Person A.
This is amplified massively when Person B is significantly younger than Person A, as we all should know by now that there is HUUUGE age stratification of risk.
e.g. afaict a jabbed-up 80 year old (particularly one with other risk factors) will be at MUCH GREATER risk of developing Covid, having high viral loads, having symptoms, etc, and passing on the virus, compared to a healthy un-jabbed 20 year old.
Seriously, ponder that the next time you hear the fear-porn generalisations about the unjabbed being "dangerous".
Why should anyone be automatically "more scared" of the un-jabbed young healthy person, than the pincushioned obese elderly person...??? Their "green pass" may make you feel safer, but in reality is that actually the case...??
How about actually quantifying it, if there is indeed real cause for concern about an individual's' risk to others..??
Or how about just stay home if you're sick, like normal..??
People who don't understand Absolute Risk Reduction of course won't comprehend this though, as usual, and continue shouting the slogans that make them feel safe...
Clown world.
Expand
